ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Discrepancy in diagnosis and characteristics of odontogenic cystic lesions in mixed dentition period; a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perilesional and Contextual Radiomic Features Improve Differentiation of Odontogenic Cysts on Panoramic Radiographs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Spontaneous regression of dentigerous cyst in a impacted mandibular first permanent molar with eruptive potential: a case report.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- "Dry Tap" Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy as a Diagnostic Clue in Cyst-like Juvenile Jaw Lesions Mimicking Dentigerous Cysts on Panoramic Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is an ambiguity in the correct diagnosis of odontogenic cystic lesions in mixed dentition period. So, present study was planned to assess diagnostic discrepancies and their potential impact on treatment strategies in pediatric odontogenic cysts. Material method: The data of the patients was retrieved from the digital records of patients from January 2014 to January 2024. After screening of the digital records, 61 cases were selected for screening, for demographic details, various clinical characteristics, radiographic investigations (OPG, CBCT etc.). For the calculation of the discrepancy between clinical and histopathological diagnosis of the radicular cyst, dentigerous cyst, and odontogenic kerato-cyst the Discrepancy Index was calculated. Results: The results revealed that 61 cases of various cystic conditions were identified. Among them, the dentigerous cyst constituted 14.7 % (9cases), radicular cyst constituted 42.6 % (26cases), and Odontogenic kerato-cyst constitutes 27.86 % (17 cases) with the mean age (in years) of reporting 9.55 ± 3.16, 9.00 ± 2.79, and10.06 ± 2.43 respectively. The odontogenic cysts were commonly found in mandibular posterior region. In patients with dentigerous cysts, 44.44 % had a history of extraction of primary teeth, 55.55 % had decayed/pulpectomised teeth. Among them the maximum discrepancy index was observed between dentigerous cysts and Odontogenic kerato-cysts i.e., 50 %, followed by radicular cyst and dentigerous cyst or vice-versa (21.42 %). Conclusion: Despite the difficult diagnosis of dentigerous cyst, radicular cyst and OKCs in mixed dentition, cystic lesions should be examined thoroughly and diagnosed carefully. Misinterpreting a cyst as a tumor, could lead to aggressive surgical intervention when a less invasive approach would suffice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.