Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41081016›Full record

ReviewImmuno-oncology technology2025

Protein engineering to overcome limitations of key cytokines in cancer immunotherapy: current approaches and future perspectives.

U Salazar, P Cioffi, B Taskoparan, I Moraga, S Mitra, J Vom Berg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immuno-oncology technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

U SalazarInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science, University of Zurich, Schlieren, Switzerland.
P CioffiUniversité de Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, UMR9020-U1277 CANTHER, Lille, France.
B TaskoparanInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science, University of Zurich, Schlieren, Switzerland.
I MoragaDivision of Cell Signalling and Immunology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
S MitraUniversité de Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, UMR9020-U1277 CANTHER, Lille, France.
J Vom BergInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science, University of Zurich, Schlieren, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given their central role in immune regulation, cytokines have long been considered attractive therapeutic agents, particularly in cancer immunotherapy. Despite a strong preclinical and clinical rationale, only a limited number of cytokines have been approved for cancer immunotherapy to date, and their clinical use often remains limited to specialized centers. Here we briefly review the biological traits that make some of the most widely studied cytokines-specifically, interleukin (IL)-2, IL-15, and IL-12-attractive for immunotherapy and, conversely, the challenges encountered during their clinical translation. Focusing on these three cytokines in the context of systemic or local delivery, we highlight protein engineering strategies that address challenges to increase their therapeutic index, such as poor tolerability, short serum half-life, and pleiotropy. For systemic delivery, these strategies include the use of shielded cytokines and immunocytokines to elicit tissue context-dependent activity by taking advantage of unique characteristics of the tumor microenvironment (TME). Half-life extension domains to increase serum prevalence, partial agonism to restrict activity to intended effector cells, and

Indexed as

cytokineimmuno-oncologyinterleukinintratumorallocal administrationprotein engineering

Identifiers

PMID41081016
PMCPMC12508866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.