Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41081007›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2025

Daily Intake of Recommended Servings of Fruit Improves Nutrient Intake but Shows no Major - Effect on Cardiovascular Health or Cognition in Low Fruit Consumers.

Shania Zingales, Jessica Martinez, Apryl Hazle Stepp, Chelsie Miller, Nate Jason, Mee Young Hong, Changqi Liu, Mark Kern, Shirin Hooshmand

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05063929 (An Investigation of the Impact of Fruit on the Gut Microbiota and Its Metabolites), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05063929 nacompletednot on this map

An Investigation of the Impact of Fruit on the Gut Microbiota and Its Metabolites: Connections to Human Health

TypeinterventionalSponsorSan Diego State UniversityRan2021 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsCardiometabolic Health, Healthy Aging, CognitionArmsFruit (2 cup eq), Fruit restriction (1/2 cup eq)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shania ZingalesSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Jessica MartinezSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Apryl Hazle SteppSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Chelsie MillerSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Nate JasonSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Mee Young HongSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Changqi LiuSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Mark KernSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Shirin HooshmandSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Research has demonstrated that fruit consumption may benefit cardiometabolic health, cognition, and motor function; however, consumption among American adults falls well below the recommended intake of 2 cups per day. Objectives: The hypothesis of the study was that consuming 2 cups of fruits, as recommended by the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, would improve cardiometabolic health, cognition, and motor function. Methods: A total of 40 healthy men and women aged 30-70 y were assigned to consume 2-cup equivalents (2C) of fruits per day and to restrict fruit (RF) intake to <½ cup in a 2-period, 8-wk randomized crossover trial, with an 8-wk washout period. Anthropometrics, blood pressure, cardiometabolic biomarkers, brachial artery flow-mediated dilation, cognition, motor function, and balance measurements were assessed before and after each trial. Results: Insulin concentrations and insulin resistance were significantly lower, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly higher after the RF trial compared with the 2C trial. Processing speed scores increased during both trials, whereas 9-Hole Pegboard performance of the dominant hand improved during the 2C trial only. Energy intake, carbohydrates, fiber, vitamin K, vitamin C, thiamin, magnesium, potassium, copper, total anthocyanins, and total flavonoids intake were higher after the 2C trial compared with the RF trial. Glycemic index was lower and glycemic load was higher during the 2C trial compared with the RF trial. Conclusions: Daily intake of 2C of fruit for 8 wk did not consistently impact cardiovascular biomarkers, body composition, cognition, or balance in habitually low fruit consumers and minimally impacted motor function; however, it improved intake of certain nutrients. Our findings suggest the need for further investigation into the optimal quantity and composition of fruit intake in diverse populations. As data accumulate, recommendations for fruit intake by the United States Department of Agriculture and the United States Department of Health and Human Services should be revisited and further studied.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05063929.

Indexed as

cognitiondietdietary guidelinesfruit intakehealthnutritionUSDA

Identifiers

PMID41081007
PMCPMC12508899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.