ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2025
Development and Validation of the Augsburg Nasopharyngeal Applicator: Enhancing Efficacy in Nasal Route Brachytherapy.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluates the Augsburg Nasopharyngeal Applicator (ANA), a novel nasal brachytherapy device designed for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (T1-T2 stages). ANA leverages nasal anatomy to overcome limitations of oral applicators, optimizing tumor targeting while sparing adjacent tissues, such as the soft palate and oral mucosa. Methods and Materials: ANA was developed using sagittal computed tomography-based anatomic measurements and computer-aided design modeling. Structural integrity was validated through nonlinear finite-element analysis, mechanical stress testing (including Euler buckling tests), and displacement testing (30 min vibration at 5 Hz with 2 cm amplitude). Dosimetry was verified using radiochromic film with 3%/3 mm gamma analysis criteria, following the TG-43 formalism for dose calculation. Insertion feasibility was assessed in a postmortem model under institutional autopsy protocols. Results: ANA (with nylon 6/6 catheter) withstood displacements up to 30 mm without failure. Simulated motion tests demonstrated positional stability (<1 mm displacement). Dosimetry achieved a 97.5% gamma pass rate (clinical acceptability threshold: 95%), with the 20 mm curvature configuration reducing soft palate doses by >50% compared to standard oral applicators (eg, Rotterdam design). Postmortem insertion was completed in 10 min, with endoscopic confirmation of positioning accuracy within 1 mm. Conclusions: ANA demonstrates precise positioning, mechanical stability under simulated physiologic motion (<1 mm displacement), and clinically significant dose sparing (>50% reduction to the soft palate with the 20 mm curvature configuration). Its nasal approach and anatomic adaptability position it as a promising alternative to oral applicators. These proof-of-concept findings support the need for phase 1/2 clinical trials to evaluate safety and efficacy in patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.