Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080995›Full record

ArticleAsian bioethics review2025

An Ethical Framework to Clinical Post-Mortem Examination in Saudi Arabia.

Ruaim Muaygil, Khaldoon Aljerian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian bioethics review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruaim MuaygilDepartment of Medical Education, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9755-6181
Khaldoon AljerianDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6690-3155

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-mortem examinations (PME) often yield valuable information regarding the cause and manner of death. They aid in identifying underlying disease, support public health efforts, and inform criminal investigations. In the clinical context, PME improves understanding of disease processes, prevents future illness in others, and provides comfort and closure to families. In Saudi Arabia, a multitude of cultural, religious, and ethical concerns often preclude frank discussions and contribute to the reluctance of both families and practitioners to pursue these examinations. In this paper, we contend that clinical PME should be routinely offered to family members after the unexplained death of an individual. To that end, we propose a religiously informed and culturally sensitive ethical framework, one that is cognizant of local cultural, ethical, and religious needs. We begin with an overview of PME, its development, and its current state in Saudi Arabia. Next, we examine the cultural, religious, and ethical challenges that contribute to the underutilization of PME. Finally, we address these challenges through our proposed framework in the hope that a more representative approach to PME will permit more utilization and benefit.

Indexed as

AutopsyIslamPost-mortem examinationSaudi ArabiaSudden death

Identifiers

PMID41080995
PMCPMC12508334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.