ArticleHuman mutation2025
Complementary Roles of Structure and Variant Effect Predictors in RyR1 Clinical Interpretation.
Article in Human mutation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Complementary Roles of Structure and Variant Effect Predictors in RyR1 Clinical Interpretation.Human mutation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RyR1-related disorders, arising from variants in the RYR1 gene encoding the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor, encompass a wide range of dominant and recessive phenotypes. The extensive length of RyR1 and diverse mechanisms underlying disease variants pose significant challenges for clinical interpretation, exacerbated by the limited performance and biases of current variant effect predictors (VEPs). This study evaluates the efficacy of 70 VEPs for distinguishing pathogenic RyR1 missense variants from putatively benign variants derived from population databases. Existing VEPs show variable performance. Those trained on known clinical labels show greater classification performance, but this is likely inflated by data circularity. In contrast, VEPs using methodologies that avoid or minimise training bias show limited performance, likely reflecting difficulty in identifying gain-of-function variants. Leveraging protein structural information, we introduce Spatial Proximity to Disease Variants (SPDV), a novel metric based solely on three-dimensional clustering of pathogenic mutations. We determine ACMG/AMP PP3/BP4 classification thresholds for our method and top-performing VEPs, allowing us to assign PP3/BP4 evidence levels to all RyR1 missense variants of uncertain significance. Thus, we suggest that our protein structure-based approach represents an orthogonal strategy over existing computational tools for aiding in the diagnosis of RyR1-related diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.