ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Retrospective analysis of subclavian venous catheterization procedures performed with ultrasound guidance by anesthesiology residents in the intensive care unit.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to promote the safe implementation of subclavian catheterization under ultrasound guidance in the intensive care unit, a method associated with relatively low infection rates and enhanced patient comfort. Additionally, this approach seeks to encourage its prioritization by anesthesiology trainees and to increase its active utilization in anesthesiology training programs. Materials and methods: Following the approval of the Ethics Committee of Etlik City Hospital, confidence assessments were conducted before and after subclavian catheterization procedures performed under ultrasound guidance by anesthesiology trainees in the anesthesiology intensive care unit between 2023 and 2024. The procedures were then retrospectively analyzed, and complications were documented. Results: No major complications were observed in any of the patients undergoing the procedure in the intensive care unit. Retrospective analysis of 40 patients revealed that 23 (57.5%) were male and 17 (42.5%) were female, with a mean age of 73.4 ± 11.3 years. Thrombosis occurred in only one patient (2.5%). Confidence assessments conducted among anesthesiology trainees demonstrated a statistically significant increase in confidence levels following training. None of the patients developed pneumothorax or hemothorax. Conclusion: It was concluded that other catheterization methods (jugular, femoral) are more frequently preferred during anesthesiology residency training. Encouraging trainees to perform subclavian catheterization under ultrasound guidance could be more beneficial in managing critically ill patients during the specialization process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.