Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080964›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Retrospective analysis of subclavian venous catheterization procedures performed with ultrasound guidance by anesthesiology residents in the intensive care unit.

Adem Yalçınkaya, Abdullah Kahraman, Cahide Kahraman, Atakan Sezgi, Ezgi Güngördü, Oral Mentes, Güler Eraslan Doğanay, Melek Didik, Azra Ozanbarcı, Jülide Ergil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Adem YalçınkayaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Abdullah KahramanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Cahide KahramanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Atakan SezgiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Ezgi GüngördüDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Oral Mentesİntensive Care Medicine, Ankara Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Güler Eraslan DoğanayDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Health Sciences University Ankara SanatoriumTraining and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Melek DidikDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Health Sciences University Ankara SanatoriumTraining and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Azra OzanbarcıDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Health Sciences University Ankara SanatoriumTraining and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Jülide ErgilDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to promote the safe implementation of subclavian catheterization under ultrasound guidance in the intensive care unit, a method associated with relatively low infection rates and enhanced patient comfort. Additionally, this approach seeks to encourage its prioritization by anesthesiology trainees and to increase its active utilization in anesthesiology training programs. Materials and methods: Following the approval of the Ethics Committee of Etlik City Hospital, confidence assessments were conducted before and after subclavian catheterization procedures performed under ultrasound guidance by anesthesiology trainees in the anesthesiology intensive care unit between 2023 and 2024. The procedures were then retrospectively analyzed, and complications were documented. Results: No major complications were observed in any of the patients undergoing the procedure in the intensive care unit. Retrospective analysis of 40 patients revealed that 23 (57.5%) were male and 17 (42.5%) were female, with a mean age of 73.4 ± 11.3 years. Thrombosis occurred in only one patient (2.5%). Confidence assessments conducted among anesthesiology trainees demonstrated a statistically significant increase in confidence levels following training. None of the patients developed pneumothorax or hemothorax. Conclusion: It was concluded that other catheterization methods (jugular, femoral) are more frequently preferred during anesthesiology residency training. Encouraging trainees to perform subclavian catheterization under ultrasound guidance could be more beneficial in managing critically ill patients during the specialization process.

Indexed as

anesthesiologycentral venous catheterresidency trainingsubclavianultrasound

Identifiers

PMID41080964
PMCPMC12511039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.