ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Comparative analysis of deep learning and radiomics models in predicting hepatocellular carcinoma differentiation via ultrasound.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating B-mode ultrasound radiomics and clinical variables to predict 26-week progression-free survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma under targeted immunotherapy.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Multi-scale deep learning models based on MRI for predicting pathological differentiation and evaluating its association with recurrence-free survival in hepatocellular carcinoma: an explainable machine learning study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop and compare predictive models for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) differentiation using ultrasound-based radiomics and deep learning, and to evaluate the clinical utility of a combined model. Methods: Radiomics and deep learning models were constructed from grayscale ultrasound images. A combined model integrating both approaches was developed. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were compared, and statistical significance was evaluated with the DeLong test. Results: The radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.736 (95% CI: 0.578-0.893), while the deep learning model achieved an AUC of 0.861 (95% CI: 0.75-0.972). The combined model outperformed both, with an AUC of 0.918 (95% CI: 0.836-1.0). The DeLong test indicated a significant improvement of the combined model over the radiomics model. Calibration analysis and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed good agreement between predictions and outcomes ( Conclusion: Integrating radiomics and deep learning enhances the predictive accuracy of ultrasound-based models for HCC differentiation, providing a promising non-invasive approach for preoperative evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.