Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080922›Full record

ArticleO&G open2025

Pregnancy Dysglycemia and Estimated Risk of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease 10-14 Years After Delivery.

Christine Field, Lanla F Conteh, Jiqiang Wu, Vidya Mullangi, Patrick Catalano, Mark B Landon, Denise M Scholtens, William L Lowe, William A Grobman, Kartik K Venkatesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in O&G open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christine FieldDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, and The Ohio State College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; the Division of Endocrinology, Reproductive Endocrine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Preventive Medicine and the Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Lanla F ContehDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, and The Ohio State College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; the Division of Endocrinology, Reproductive Endocrine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Preventive Medicine and the Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Jiqiang WuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, and The Ohio State College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; the Division of Endocrinology, Reproductive Endocrine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Preventive Medicine and the Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Vidya MullangiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, and The Ohio State College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; the Division of Endocrinology, Reproductive Endocrine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Preventive Medicine and the Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Patrick CatalanoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, and The Ohio State College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; the Division of Endocrinology, Reproductive Endocrine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Preventive Medicine and the Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Mark B LandonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, and The Ohio State College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; the Division of Endocrinology, Reproductive Endocrine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Preventive Medicine and the Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Denise M ScholtensDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, and The Ohio State College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; the Division of Endocrinology, Reproductive Endocrine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Preventive Medicine and the Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
William L LoweDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, and The Ohio State College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; the Division of Endocrinology, Reproductive Endocrine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Preventive Medicine and the Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
William A GrobmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, and The Ohio State College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; the Division of Endocrinology, Reproductive Endocrine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Preventive Medicine and the Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Kartik K VenkateshDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, and The Ohio State College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; the Division of Endocrinology, Reproductive Endocrine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Preventive Medicine and the Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether pregnancy dysglycemia in the early third trimester was associated with a higher estimated risk of postpartum metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) assessed 10-14 years after delivery.

methodsThis was a secondary analysis from the prospective international cohort study HAPO FUS (Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Follow-up Study). The exposure was pregnancy dysglycemia in the third trimester, identified by the glucose summary z-score of a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24-32 weeks of gestation, and, secondarily, a diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The outcome was the estimated 6-year risk of MASLD determined by the Framingham Fatty Liver Disease Risk Function. Multivariable linear and multinomial regression models were used and adjusted for baseline covariates at the time of the OGTT, including study field center, age, parity, gestational age, and duration from enrollment to follow-up.

resultsOf 4,697 assessed pregnant individuals, the median age was 30.5 years (interquartile range 26.0, 34.1 years) and the median body mass index was 26.6 (interquartile range 24.1, 29.9); 14.3% (n=672) were diagnosed with GDM. At 10-14 years after delivery (median 11.6 years, interquartile range 10.8, 12.4 years), the median estimated 6-year risk of MASLD was 6.0% (interquartile 3.0%, 13.0%). Individuals with a higher third trimester glucose summary z-score were at higher estimated risk of postpartum MASLD (adjusted beta coefficient 3.2 per 1 SD; 95% CI, 2.7-3.6), as were those who were diagnosed with GDM (adjusted beta coefficient 4.2%; 95% CI, 3.1-5.2). When MASLD risk was assessed in tertiles, an increase of 1 SD in the summary z-score was associated with greater adjusted odds of being in the highest-risk MASLD tertile (adjusted odds ratio 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.3); however, a diagnosis of GDM was not associated with greater adjusted odds of being in the highest-risk MASLD tertile.

conclusionIncreasing pregnancy dysglycemia in the third trimester was associated with a higher estimated risk of postpartum MASLD using cardiometabolic risk factors measured 10-14 years after delivery. Whether postpartum interventions to improve cardiometabolic health for individuals with prior pregnancy dysglycemia decreases the risk of MASLD requires further investigation.

Identifiers

PMID41080922
PMCPMC12510149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.