Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080884›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Data-driven hierarchical causal modeling of risk propagation in bridge operations: evidence from 132 accidents in China.

Peng Peng, Zuocai Wang, Peng Cui, Xiaokang Hu, Junfeng Yao, Sainan Lyu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peng PengSchool of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China.
Zuocai WangSchool of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China.
Peng CuiSchool of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Xiaokang HuSchool of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China.
Junfeng YaoSchool of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China.
Sainan LyuSchool of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging bridges worldwide face growing safety challenges due to extended service life and environmental stressors. However, most existing studies lack a systemic perspective and mainly rely on fragmented, expert-driven assessments. Such approaches fail to capture the interplay of risk factors. This gap in understanding the interactions and propagation of risks limits the development of effective safety strategies for bridge operation. To address this gap, this study aims to identify and structure key risk factors affecting bridge safety in operational contexts by adopting a data-driven hierarchical model. Utilizing 132 officially documented accident reports from national safety databases in China (2007-2024), text mining techniques are applied to extract lexical risk items, which are subsequently refined through expert workshops and association rule mining to capture factor relationships. The Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method, integrated with Adversarial Interpretive Structural Modeling (AISM), is applied to construct a multi-level causal hierarchy of safety risks. The findings reveal 19 distinct risk factors, structured into seven levels with 20 transmission pathways. Notably, insufficient informatization management and unqualified managerial competence are identified as foundational factors, while overweight vehicle passage, inadequate inspection and maintenance, and geological and meteorological hazards emerge as direct triggers of safety incidents. The constructed hierarchy demonstrates a clear propagation chain from latent management deficiencies to observable surface-level hazards. Theoretically, the study advances the understanding of risk interaction mechanisms by integrating quantitative data analysis with expert interpretation. Practically, it provides infrastructure safety managers with a structured roadmap for targeted interventions, emphasizing the importance of enhancing digital management systems, traffic load regulation, and emergency preparedness in bridge operation contexts.

Indexed as

AccidentsData MiningCausalityChinaRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsbridge operation safetyhierarchical risk modelingoperational hazard managementrisk propagation pathwayssafety risk factors

Identifiers

PMID41080884
PMCPMC12511089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.