ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Assessment and prediction of copper release amount from copper oxide facepieces.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Disposable facepieces, as important personal protective equipment, provide respiratory protection for workers. However, Cu containing facepieces may cause Cu release, posing a potential danger to human health. Methods: In this study, aging experiments were conducted on 36 groups of facepieces, simulating the use of facepieces under high temperature, radiation environment and work rate to assess the exposure levels of workers to Cu amount. Meanwhile, a machine learning model was developed based on the Cu release amount to predict the exposure level. Results: The research found that after simulating the aging of facepieces, the Cu release ranged from 7.25µg to 23.65µg, and the release trend showed an increasing trend under the simulated harsh conditions. The exposure levels in different scenarios were evaluated based on the release amount. Among them, 27 groups were evaluated as level III and 9 groups were evaluated as level II. Furthermore, the prediction results of Support Vector Machine (SVM), Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN), and Random Forest (RF), test and training sets were evaluated using coefficient of determination (R Conclusion: The research method in this study can effectively assess the Cu exposure level of workers and provide a scientific basis for occupational health monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.