Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080856›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Efficacy of internet-based peer education for postpartum depression: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Yu-Mei Zhou, Xiao-Wan Xiong, Han Zhou, Xiao-Ming Ma, Bing Yan, Jiang-Ning Qiu, Xiao-Yi Chen, Liu-Juan Zhang, Yan-Fang Wei, Xiao-Bing Zheng and 7 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yu-Mei ZhouShenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Xiao-Wan XiongShenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Han ZhouShenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Xiao-Ming MaShenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Bing YanShenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Jiang-Ning QiuShenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Xiao-Yi ChenShenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Liu-Juan ZhangShenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Yan-Fang WeiShenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Xiao-Bing ZhengShenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Lin-Qing LiShenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Shao-Jun ChenShenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Yin-Li XuShenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Si-Yi HanShenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Yu-Fen LinShenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Yu-Qin XuShenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Yan-Hua GouShenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Postpartum depression (PPD) is widely and profoundly affecting family and social stability. But now the consultation rate of overall PPD population is still not ideal for practical reasons. This study observes the effectiveness of Internet-based peer education, a promising treatment approach that may effectively and fairly serve the PPD group, so as to benefit more people in the future. Objectives: This study integrates internet-based peer education to serve PPD groups effectively and equitably, aiming to benefit more people. It explores IPE's efficacy vs. RHE in reducing symptom severity at 6-week intervention and 16-week follow-up. Methods: This study is a randomized, parallel, and controlled trial, consist of a 6-week treatment period along with a 12-week follow-up period. Eighty-eight patients diagnosed as PPD will be recruited. They will be randomly assigned to one of two groups, internet-based peer education (IPE) group and regular health education (RHE) group, in a 1:1 ratio. Both groups will receive RHE along the 6-week treatment, while subjects in IPE group will receive 6-week online peer education additionally. The primary outcome is the response rate based on scores of 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at the week 6 and 12. The secondary outcomes include Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS), World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief (WHOQOL-BREF) and Self-Efficacy to Manage Chronic Disease Scale (SEMCD). All these scales will be evaluated at baseline, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 weeks after the initiation of intervention. Conclusion: The results of this RCT on Internet-based peer education for postpartum depression will provide an assessment of the feasibility of the protocol and data for power calculations to inform the development of a larger scale trial.

Indexed as

Depression, PostpartumHealth EducationInternetInternet-Based InterventionPeer GroupAdultFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicinternet-basedpeer educationpostpartum depressionprotocolrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID41080856
PMCPMC12507833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.