Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080852›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Exploring behavioral factors and emotional mechanisms underlying older adult users' adoption of smart health services: evidence from PLS-SEM and fsQCA.

Ming-Xi Sun, Zhi-Feng Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ming-Xi SunSchool of Arts, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Zhi-Feng ZhaoSchool of Arts, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In a population aging society, home-based older adult care as the primary model have experienced a robust growth in demand for smart health services (SHS), reflecting an active response to evolving older adult care needs. However, older adult users' adoption rates are constrained by the interplay of technological and emotional factors, with the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Methods: To address this concern, this study integrates the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Emotional Durable Design (EDD) theory to uncover the behavioral factors and emotional driving mechanisms behind older adult users' adoption of SHS. A total of 244 valid questionnaires from older adult users were collected. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed to analyze the net effects of variables, combined with fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to identify configurational paths. Results and discussion: The results show that perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and perceived emotion directly and positively influence behavioral intention. Mental interaction, self-actualization, and dynamic adaptation in emotional durable design exert indirect effects on behavioral intention through internalization processes. fsQCA identified 7 configurational paths leading to high behavioral intention, confirming the combined effects of "technology-emotion" factors, with no single factor constituting a necessary condition. This study contributes to expanding the emotional explanatory dimension of TAM, providing a theoretical foundation and practical guidelines for the human-centered design and promotion of SHS.

Indexed as

EmotionsPatient Acceptance of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLatent Class AnalysisLeast-Squares AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesemotionally durable designfsQCAPLS-SEMsmart health servicesTAM

Identifiers

PMID41080852
PMCPMC12512665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.