ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Consumption of fresh or minimally processed foods and ultra-processed foods according to social vulnerability among Brazilian university students.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic worsened the diet quality of the population, including young adults, owing to the sudden economic insecurity caused by global chaos. Objective: To describe the food consumption of students admitted to university after the pandemic, according to the social vulnerability situation. Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted with students who were in a Brazilian public university located in Rio de Janeiro in 2022. Data collection was carried out online. Fresh or minimally processed foods and ultra-processed foods were assessed considering the consumption on the previous day and the regular intake (>5 days/week). To assess social vulnerability three indicators were used: the form of university admission, a socioeconomic score, and food (in)security. Results: A total of 924 students participated in the study. Most of them were 18-22 years-old (50%), cisgender women (62%), of white people (53%), 30% were quota students, 32% had family income ranging between 2 to 5 minimum wages, and 36% were food insecure, with or without hunger. Consumption of fresh or minimally processed foods was more frequent among students with a higher socioeconomic score, non-quota students, and food-secure ones. Consumption of ultra-processed foods seems to have been less influenced by students' social conditions in this sample of students. Conclusion: The food consumption, mainly related to fresh or minimally processed foods, was influenced by the vulnerability of university students. The findings reinforce the need for permanent student support policies, since universities can be strategic places to ensure the human right to adequate and healthy food.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.