ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Can digital twin technology revolutionize public health emergency management? Insights from the PPRR framework.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of emergency management capabilities for public health emergencies in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inherent nature of public health emergencies often renders them unpredictable and inadequately managed in a timely manner, resulting in significant impacts on lives, property, and social stability. In recent years, the frequency and severity of such emergencies have escalated. As an integration of artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, big data, and the Internet of Things, digital twin technology has been increasingly adopted across diverse fields, including industrial production, urban planning, and healthcare. This study aimed to investigate recent advancements in digital twin technology, particularly in the fields of medicine and urban construction, with a focus on its potential to mitigate the impacts of public health crises. By employing the PPRR framework, this study further explored the prospects for constructing and applying digital twin technology within the public health management system. Taking perceived fidelity (SF), model plasticity (MP), decision coupling (DC), and governance credibility (GC) as the core constructs, we discussed the operability of unified modeling and quantitative evaluation of each stage of digital twin implementation. This approach comprehensively explained all four phases of emergency management: prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery. Through enabling the digitalization, intelligence, and visualization of the entire health emergency management process, digital twin technology offers holistic solutions throughout the life cycle of public health emergencies. These include preventive measures, real-time detection, early warning systems, and intelligent emergency response management. Such innovations have the potential to significantly enhance management efficiency and effectiveness, bolster coordinated responses to public health crises, and improve the overall resilience of public health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.