Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080831›Full record

ArticleInnovations in pharmacy2025

Occupational Licensing Reform: A Step-by-Step Approach for Pharmacy Licensing Boards.

Alex Adams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovations in pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alex AdamsIdaho Department of Health and Welfare.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occupational licensing reform is essential but challenging for state agencies. This paper presents a step-by-step framework for pharmacy licensing boards, inspired by the Idaho State Board of Pharmacy's (BOP) efforts, which achieved a 75% cut in regulatory page count while creating a more permissive practice environment. By establishing baselines, prioritizing reform areas, and setting clear reduction goals, the BOP streamlined licensing, modernized professional practice standards, and adopted technology-agnostic facility regulations. The transition to enforcement-centric accountability ensured public safety while fostering innovation and economic growth. Early results include increased pharmacy services, improved access, and significant industry investments. This framework offers a replicable approach for other licensing boards to reduce red tape, support economic growth, and enhance regulatory efficiency without compromising health and safety.

Indexed as

Occupational Licensing ReformPharmacy Licensing Boards

Identifiers

PMID41080831
PMCPMC12509714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.