Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080823›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2025

Kickstarting the Adoption Process of Reusable Surgical Gowns in Healthcare: Expectations, Evaluation and Factors That May Influence Healthcare Professional's Willingness to Wear Reusable Gowns.

Charlotte Harding, Ingrid Moons, Gunter De Win, Els Du Bois

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charlotte HardingDepartment of Product Development, Faculty of Design Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0101-7854
Ingrid MoonsDepartment of Product Development, Faculty of Design Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Gunter De WinDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
Els Du BoisDepartment of Product Development, Faculty of Design Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2377-184X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Health organizations play a critical role in society, but they also contribute significantly to global carbon emissions. This study examines the adoption of reusable surgical gowns to reduce operating room waste and emissions. Methods: Two surveys (n Results: It was found that participants of the pilot test had greater adoption intention than HCP without recent experience. Moreover, HCP with higher expectations about reusable gowns were also more willing to adopt. Misconceptions about reusable gowns being old-fashioned or inferior were common among those unwilling to adopt. Currently, HCP have lower expectations about reusable gowns compared to the disposables in use, in terms of trust in protection, comfort and usability. However, participants of the pilot test evaluated their trust in protective properties higher than what HCP without wearing the gown had initially expected. Conclusion: Information campaigns on reusables in healthcare and educational insights on their safe use can improve perceptions about reusable gowns as a safe and high-quality alternative. This study's findings may guide legislative efforts and hospital managers to promote sustainable healthcare practices. Fostering bottom-up readiness among HCPs may influence the hospital's procurement process. Additionally, further improving the design of reusable products can optimize the user satisfaction.

Indexed as

adoption processcircular economyreusable productsreusable surgical gownssurvey researchtrialability

Identifiers

PMID41080823
PMCPMC12514962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.