ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Deep learning-based stress detection from RR intervals in major depressive disorder, panic disorder, and healthy individuals.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stress exacerbates major depressive disorder (MDD) and panic disorder (PD), highlighting the need for continuous stress quantification. Because stress modulates autonomic function, heart rate variability (HRV) is commonly studied for stress detection. However, conventional HRV pipelines require 5-min recordings and handcrafted features, limiting real-time use. We evaluated whether a one-dimensional (1D) residual network can identify acute cognitive stress directly from ultra-short RR interval (RRI) signals in MDD, PD, and healthy controls (HCs). Methods: One hundred forty-seven adults (MDD = 41, PD = 47, HC = 59) completed up to five lab visits over 12 weeks. At each visit, RRIs were recorded during a 5-min resting baseline and a 5-min mental-arithmetic stressor. A 1D ResNet34 classified baseline versus stress from raw RRIs using both 5-min segments and 1-min epochs. Group-specific models were compared with a combined model trained on pooled data. Generalized estimating equations tested group and phase effects on RRIs. Results: Stress shortened RRIs in every group, but less in patients with MDD and PD than in HC. Combined training outperformed group-specific training: for 5-min data, accuracies reached 0.866 (MDD), 0.865 (PD), and 0.897 (HC); 1-min accuracies were 0.788, 0.815, and 0.797, respectively. Conclusion: Deep learning on raw RRIs detects acute cognitive stress across psychiatric and healthy cohorts without feature engineering. Five-minute windows still yield the best performance, yet 1-min epochs still achieve accuracies of approximately 0.80, demonstrating feasibility for integration into real-time monitoring tools for relapse prevention and personalized care in psychiatry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.