ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Bridging the gap in outpatient care for adolescent eating disorders: Usability of a digital mental health intervention for anorexia or bulimia nervosa.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Assessing the Usability, Feasibility, and Engagement in IM FAB, a Functionality-Focused Micro-Intervention to Reduce Eating Disorder Risk.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eating disorders such as Anorexia Nervosa (AN) and Bulimia Nervosa (BN) are serious mental illnesses that typically emerge during adolescence and often become chronic. In Germany, affected individuals wait an average of 26 weeks for outpatient psychotherapy, creating a critical treatment gap. Digital interventions may serve as a bridging solution, particularly for the digitally oriented younger population. This study evaluated the Usability, Acceptance and perceived Usefulness of a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based mobile intervention for adolescents with AN or BN. Data collection occurred in two phases: an initial pilot with 10 mentally healthy adolescents (mean age = 13.8, SD = 1.2; n_female = 7), followed by a second phase with 20 adolescents (mean age = 14.9, SD = 1.6; n_female = 20) diagnosed with an eating disorder. Assessments included the German Mobile Health App Usability Questionnaire (G-MAUQ) and semi-structured focus group interviews. Qualitative data was analyzed using content analysis according to Kuckartz. On a 1-7 scale, the clinical group and the healthy group reported similar mean usability scores (M = 5.97, SD = 0.44 vs. M = 5.84, SD = 0.44), indicating high usability in both groups. Feedback clustered around four themes: Interface Satisfaction, Feature Acceptance, Ease of Use, and Usefulness. Personalization through companions, gamification, and design were well received. The meal planner was particularly valued for its practical relevance. Focus group interviews highlighted both strengths (e.g., personal approach, interactive format, structured meal planning) and areas for improvement (e.g., text length). Given its scalability, this CBT-based intervention may help fill existing service gaps in the healthcare of adolescents with eating disorders and complement existing treatment pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.