Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080650›Full record

ReviewCerebral circulation - cognition and behavior2025

Cerebral small vessel disease lesion segmentation methods: A systematic review.

Jolene Phelps, Manpreet Singh, Cheryl R McCreary, Caroline Dallaire-Théroux, Ryan G Stein, Zacharie Potvin-Jutras, Dylan X Guan, Jeng-Liang D Wu, Amelie Metz, Eric E Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jolene PhelpsDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Manpreet SinghMultiomics Investigation of Neurodegenerative Diseases (MIND) Laboratory, Montréal, Canada.
Cheryl R McCrearyDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Caroline Dallaire-ThérouxDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus, CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Ryan G SteinAging, Mobility, and Cognitive Health Laboratory, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Zacharie Potvin-JutrasDepartment of Physics, Concordia University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Dylan X GuanHotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Jeng-Liang D WuVulnerable Brain Lab, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Amelie MetzDouglas Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Eric E SmithDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) can manifest as brain lesions visible on magnetic resonance imaging, including white matter hyperintensities (WMH), cerebral microbleeds (CMB), perivascular spaces (PVS), lacunes, and recent small subcortical infarcts (RSSI). Detection and segmentation of these imaging markers can provide valuable information on brain health, including prevention and treatment of dementia. However, manual segmentation is cumbersome, especially for large cohorts in research studies. There has been extensive research into the development of automated tools using machine learning to increase accuracy and efficiency in lesion segmentation. This systematic review aimed to summarize novel automated methods developed over the last 10 years that segment CSVD lesion types and have been validated on a population with or at risk for CSVD (

Indexed as

Cerebral infarctsLeukoaraiosisMagnetic resonance imagingMicrobleedsPerivascular spaces

Identifiers

PMID41080650
PMCPMC12513155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.