ArticleBioMedicine2025
A Staged-OLIF approach can minimize construct lengths in adult spinal deformity- A case series and literature review.
Article in BioMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) is one of the challenging conditions to treat for spine surgeons. One of the important dilemmas in the management of these patients is the decision on the number of levels of instrumentation and the overall length of the construct. OLIF has the advantage of providing a minimally invasive approach to address this complex pathology also allowing us to stage the procedure and thus help clinicians reassess if the patient requires an additional decompression, long fusion lengths, or need for osteotomies. Aim: Our study aims to evaluate the possibility of minimizing the construct length following a staged OLIF approach in ASD patients and also to analyze the clinical and radiological outcomes following a staged OLIF surgery. Methods: We present three cases of ASD, where the patients had a significant imbalance in either the coronal/sagittal profiles, and by using a staged approach, the surgeon was able to reduce the construct lengths and also operate on these deformities using an all Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) approach. Results: Overall sagittal and coronal profiles improved in all three cases with satisfactory fusion rates and VAS scores (back pain) post-operatively. Two of the three patients had an all-MIS approach (OLIF with MIS Ponte osteotomy and robotic guided pedicle screw instrumentation) and in one patient a four-rod construct was preferred to improve the stability. No complications were observed during a mean follow-up period of 4 years. Conclusion: A staged approach in ASD (lateral OLIF and posterior instrumentation) is a valuable surgical strategy for better correction of the coronal and sagittal plane deformities with relatively lesser construct length. It reduces the problems associated with prolonged anesthesia, in addition, it helps the surgeon in reassessing the pelvic parameters, thereby helping to decide on the need for additional osteotomies during the second procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.