Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2025
Patient and donor antibody profiles in early COVID-19 convalescent plasma therapy in the COnV-ert trial.
Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04621123 (Convalescent Methylene Blue Treated), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Convalescent Methylene Blue Treated (MBT) Plasma for Early Treatment in Non-hospitalised Mild or Moderate COVID-19 Patients: a Randomized Double Blind Study (COnV-ert)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- COVID-19 convalescent plasma safety and efficacy analysis for biologics license application approval.Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The negative efficacy results of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent plasma (CCP) as early treatment in the COnV-ert trial have been attributed to the use of methylene blue (MB). We characterized immune responses after MB-treated CCP infusion and the impact of MB on antibodies of the infused CCP units. Methods: We measured antibody isotypes (IgG, IgM, and IgA) and IgG subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike (S) antigens, neutralizing antibody titers, and IgG avidity in 128 participants of the COnV-ert trial 7 and 60 days after infusion and in paired CCP units before and after MB treatment. Results: Treatment with CCP significantly increased the levels of IgG and IgG1 to receptor-binding domain (RBD) and S, IgG3 to S and S2, and IgG avidity in recipients 7 days after infusion, without an increase in IgA, IgM, IgG2, IgG4, or neutralization. At day 7 post-infusion, recipients exhibited lower IgG, all IgG subclasses, and avidity; higher IgA and IgM; and comparable neutralization relative to paired CCP units. MB was associated with a significant decrease in cytophilic subclasses IgG1 and IgG3 to S and S2, and IgA to RBD, S and S2 in CCP units, without a reduction in neutralization titer and with a modest increase in IgG2 to RBD and S. Discussion: Our study shows a modest impact of a single intravenous infusion of MB-treated high-titer CCP on circulating antibody levels compared to those generated by the host by day 7 and an adverse effect of MB on IgG1 and IgG3, which are essential for effector functions. Clinical trial registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT04621123.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.