Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080573›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

Real-world outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy in older adult patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a multi-center, retrospective analysis.

Hiroaki Ikoma, Shuzo Hamamoto, Yoshihiko Tasaki, Misato Tomita, Takuya Sakata, Hiroko Suzuki, Yusuke Noda, Masayuki Usami, Yohei Tsubouchi, Yoshihisa Mimura and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Hiroaki IkomaDepartment of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Shuzo HamamotoDepartment of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoshihiko TasakiDepartment of Clinical Pharmaceutics, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Misato TomitaDepartment of Clinical Pharmaceutics, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Takuya SakataDepartment of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Hiroko SuzukiDepartment of Urology, Kainan Hospital, Yatomi, Japan.
Yusuke NodaDepartment of Urology, Anjo Kosei Hospital, Anjo, Japan.
Masayuki UsamiDepartment of Urology, Toyota Kosei Hospital, Toyota, Japan.
Yohei TsubouchiDepartment of Urology, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan.
Yoshihisa MimuraDepartment of Clinical Pharmaceutics, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Toshiharu MorikawaDepartment of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Takashi NagaiDepartment of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Rei UnnoDepartment of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Toshiki EtaniDepartment of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Taku NaikiDepartment of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Yosuke SugiyamaDepartment of Clinical Pharmaceutics, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Takahiro YasuiDepartment of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapy has revolutionized first-line treatment outcomes for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In this study, we aimed to retrospectively analyze real-world clinical outcomes and toxicities of first-line ICI-based combination therapies, specifically nivolumab plus ipilimumab (IO+IO) and ICIs plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (IO+TKI), in Japanese patients with mRCC aged ≥ 75 years compared with non-older adult patients. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 156 patients with mRCC who received first-line IO+IO or IO+TKI between September 2018 and June 2024 at eight Japanese institutions. Patients were categorized into an older adult group (≥ 75 years, n=49) and a non-older adult group (< 75 years, n=107). We evaluated objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Results: The overall ORR (47% vs. 59%, p=0.43) and DCR (86% vs. 83%, p=0.65) were comparable between groups. No significant differences were observed in PFS (median: 15.5 vs. 17.0 months, p=0.78) or OS (NA vs. 52.2 months, p=0.61). In the IO+IO regimen, the ORR, DCR, PFS, OS, and AE rates were comparable across age groups. However, in the IO+TKI regimen  ×cohort, the ORR was significantly lower in older adults (55% vs. 81%, p=0.04), and treatment discontinuation due to AEs was significantly higher in older adults (60% vs. 32%, p=0.02), with a shorter time to discontinuation despite no difference in the initial TKI dose and RDI. The non-older adult group showed significantly better PFS with IO+TKI compared with IO+IO (hazard ratio: 2.37, p=0.02). In contrast, in the older adult group, PFS and OS were approximately equivalent between the two regimens. Conclusion: Our real-world data indicated that ICI-based combination therapies are effective in patients with mRCC aged ≥75 years, with outcomes largely non-inferior to non-older adult patients. However, the comparable efficacy of IO+TKI and IO+IO in the older adult group, which may differs from that in the non-older adult group, highlights the importance of understanding the distinct characteristics of each regimen for individualized treatment selection and careful management, particularly regarding AE monitoring and dose adjustment in older adult patients receiving IO+TKI.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Renal CellImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsKidney NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansIpilimumabMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNivolumabProtein Kinase InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabNivolumabProtein Kinase Inhibitorsadverse eventimmune checkpoint inhibitormetastatic renal cell carcinomaolder adult patienttyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID41080573
PMCPMC12507601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.