ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Establishment and validation of the prediction model based on lymphocyte subsets for acute kidney injury in sepsis patients.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An interpretable prediction model for severe sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in older ICU patients with sepsis: a prospective multicenter cohort study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Immunoinflammatory biomarkers for sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: a multicenter prospective cohort study.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2026Article
- Nomogram analysis of factors associated with prognosis in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: a case-control study based on LASSO regression.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Sepsis: Immune Trajectories, Monocyte Dysfunction, and Translational Biomarkers.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to construct a risk predictive model for acute kidney injury in sepsis based on peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets. Methods: This prospective study included patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU from March to August 2024 (483 for training and 146 for validation), and 125 patients from September to December 2024 as the external test cohort. Clinical data and peripheral blood samples on days 1 and 3 were collected after ICU admission. Lymphocyte subsets were analyzed using flow cytometry, covering T cell, B cell, NK cell populations. Differences in clinical variables and lymphocyte subsets between AKI and non-AKI groups were analyzed. A predictive model was developed using LASSO and multivariate logistic regression and validated internally (5-fold cross-validation) and externally. Model performance was assessed using ROC curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). A nomogram was constructed for clinical applications. Results: Among the 483 patients, the incidence of AKI was 54.66%. Compared to non-AKI patients, the AKI group had significantly higher SOFA and APACHE II scores and lower GCS scores. Laboratory findings showed higher neutrophil and monocyte counts, and elevated serum creatinine in the AKI group. On day 1, several lymphocyte subsets were significantly altered in the AKI group, including increased CD4 Conclusion: Peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets are significantly altered in patients who develop SA-AKI and can serve as potential early biomarkers. The developed predictive model based on clinical and immunological parameters demonstrated robust performance in identifying patients at high risk of SA-AKI, offering a practical tool for early warning and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.