ArticleEcology and evolution2025
QuickConc: A Rapid, Efficient, and Power-Free eDNA Concentration Method With Cationic-Assisted Capture.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis is effective for non-invasive biodiversity monitoring, as it reveals species distribution and abundance without ecosystem disruption. Four key steps in eDNA analysis include water preservation, DNA capture, DNA extraction, and detection. Among these, the capture of eDNA has attracted significant research interest due to the variability of water samples. Although various methods for eDNA concentration have been developed, including filtration using disc or cartridge filters and passive samplers, no single method is universally applicable because of the variabilities of eDNA distribution and water characteristics, including turbidity levels. Therefore, the development of alternative eDNA concentration methods is important for advancing eDNA research. This study introduces QuickConc, a novel nucleic acid capture method that combines an enhancer of benzalkonium chloride with dispersed silica glass fibers, allowing better binding between nucleic acids and glass fibers. Our results indicate that this approach enhances eDNA capture and extraction efficiency by likely improving the interaction between glass fibers and eDNA. We tested QuickConc in three environments using qPCR and metabarcoding. QuickConc yielded 1.3-3 times more total eDNA compared to glass fiber filtration and Sterivex methods under our experimental settings. Species-specific qPCR results showed that QuickConc detected 2-10 times higher copy numbers compared to the other two methods. Metabarcoding analyses using the MiFish method revealed that the number of fish species detected in river water was higher with QuickConc compared to other methods, while in sea water, the number of fish species detected was similar to the glass fiber filtration and Sterivex methods. QuickConc offers new options for eDNA analysis for biodiversity monitoring and conservation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.