ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Moth Communities Reveal High Stability Despite Ongoing Compositional Shifts Over Five Years Following Hurricane Disturbance.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Moth Communities Reveal High Stability Despite Ongoing Compositional Shifts Over Five Years Following Hurricane Disturbance.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extreme climatic events are expected to increase in frequency and severity under climate change, with lasting consequences for ecological communities worldwide. Global insect declines have raised concerns for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem stability, as shifts in insect communities can trigger cascading effects across trophic levels. Yet insect responses to large-scale disturbances remain poorly understood, particularly in tropical forests where long-term datasets are scarce and taxonomic knowledge is limited. We examined the response trajectories and stability of moth communities in two forest types in Puerto Rico following the September 2017 hurricanes Irma and María. Using monthly surveys conducted 5 months before and 6 months after the storms, followed by annual surveys over 5 years, we tracked changes in moth abundance, richness, and composition. We also evaluated ecological stability across multiple dimensions (i.e., resistance, resilience, recovery, and temporal stability) for the entire community and separately for Crambidae, Erebidae, and Geometridae. Despite initial declines, abundance and richness surpassed baseline levels within the first year, especially in old-growth tabonuco stands, which may have provided more stable microhabitats and resources than palm stands. Resistance varied by family, with grass-feeding crambids increasing in abundance and arboreal-feeding geometrids experiencing the greatest species loss. Abundance and richness stabilized within 2 years, likely influenced by trophic interactions that regulated insect outbreaks. Species composition continued to shift over time, reflecting ongoing reassembly, while compositional and functional stability metrics suggested recovery within 5 years. This highlights both the resilience of the moth community and the dynamic nature of post-disturbance reassembly. Our findings underscore the value of multi-year, post-disturbance datasets for uncovering recovery pathways and enhancing our understanding of ecological stability. As extreme events intensify across biomes, insights into resilience dynamics will be critical for sustaining insect biodiversity and the ecological functions they provide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.