ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2025
Social Interactions for Sustainable Food Choices: Meeting the Target for Meat Intake in the United Kingdom.
Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health co-benefits of sustainable dietary transitions to reduced red and processed meat intake in the United Kingdom: a modelling study.European journal of nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Substantial shifts in contemporary diets are needed to halt the growing burden of chronic diseases and the accelerating climate crisis. Achieving this will require strong action and the use of policy instruments that can aid consumers in making the right dietary choices. Real-life evidence on changing dietary behaviors within complex food systems at scale demands resources and research that might not be realistic to acquire or realize. Objectives: This project applied innovative models to predict the dietary and environmental effects of broad-scale strategies designed to transform dietary behaviors among consumers. Scenarios were numerically simulated using agent-based opinion-dynamics models to evaluate the impact of governmental influence on people's consumption of meat, vegetables, pulses, and meat alternatives. Methods: We considered the problem of influencing the opinions of a group of agents (representing the UK population) connected in a social network over a sequence of campaigns to achieve convergence to 2 different targets: achieving the UK Climate Change Committee's goal of 35% and 50% average reduction in meat consumption by 2030 and 2050, respectively. The opinion dynamics comprised consumers (i.e., agents), with empirically derived baseline food intake patterns (i.e., initial opinions) and sociodemographic attributes. Changes in environmental impacts following changes in consumption were quantified. Results: In a scenario of high governmental influence, uniform in the population, achievement of the 35% and 50% meat reduction goals corresponded to ∼5.2 and ∼8.1 y, respectively. As meat consumption reduced, intake of vegetables, pulses, and meat alternatives increased by 84.7%, 108.5%, and 30.8%, respectively (-35% scenario). Greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water use, and scarcity-weighted water were reduced by -23.8%, -20.2%, -0.5%, and -14.5%, respectively (-35% scenario). Conclusions: The findings of this project provide valuable insights for policymakers and governmental authorities to develop effective influence strategies aimed at promoting healthy and sustainable dietary habits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.