ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2025
Influencing factors of public willingness to implement cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A mixed-methods systematic review.
Review in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Using serious games for cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Knowledge and Willingness to Perform Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation by Bystanders in Jordan; A Nationwide Cross-sectional Study.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a key element in the chain of survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, enhancing patient survival rates. However, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation rates remain low. Aim: (s)To systematically evaluate the factors influencing bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and provide a foundation for developing training programs and guiding future research. Methods: The systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta--Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO. Data sources: A comprehensive search of 4 databases (the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase) were searched between the database's creation and November 13, 2024. Results: A total of 11,730 studies were initially retrieved, with 28 ultimately included in the analysis. Among these, 4 were qualitative studies, and 24 were quantitative studies. Data integration was performed using Nvivo14 software. Conclusion: The findings demonstrated that cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) knowledge, abilities, training experience, rescue objects, and rescue techniques all had an impact on the public's willingness to perform CPR. Ethics teaching will be included in the training content, and future courses will use female simulators. Second, to address the issue of a lack of CPR knowledge, CPR instruction can be included in the curriculum of schools in nations such as China which have a poor rate of CPR training development. To increase the public's rate of mastery of CPR-related knowledge, the training frequency should be increased concurrently. And it is suggested that the state create relevant legislation to safeguard rescuers. Finally, designing specialized evaluation instruments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.