Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080428›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

A modified Gompertz model and its MATLAB implementation for microbial growth performance assessment.

Loyal Murphy, Q Peter He, Jin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Loyal MurphyAuburn University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.
Q Peter HeAuburn University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.
Jin WangAuburn University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To systematically assess the growth performance of different methanotrophs, microalgae and their cocultures, this work presents an improved four-parameter Zwietering modification of the Gompertz model (4Z model) to extract biologically relevant information using batch growth data. The 4Z model was based on the three-parameter Zwietering modification of the original Gompertz model, with a constant term added to address the discrepancy between model predictions and measurements for the initial period of growth data. The 4Z model provided excellent fits to the batch growth data of different monocultures and cocultures. However, the parameters in the 4Z model are different from the commonly used maximum growth rate and delay time, making interpretation of the results challenging. To facilitate the assessment of different strains, we follow the two-step procedure to extract biologically significant parameters: 1. Estimate the four parameters in the 4Z model using the whole batch growth trajectory. 2. Use the 4Z model prediction of early-stage growth data to estimate the biologically significant parameters in the commonly used exponential growth model. The estimated biologically significant parameters (maximum growth rate, delay time, and carrying capacity) enabled an unbiased assessment of different strains.

Indexed as

Gompertz modelMethanotrophsMethanotrophs – microalgae cocultureMicroalgaeMicrobial batch growth

Identifiers

PMID41080428
PMCPMC12509108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.