ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025
Improving support for people with mental health problems in China: a cluster randomised controlled trial of culturally adapted Mental Health First Aid training.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Culturally appropriate interventions that teach members of the public to provide early help towards a person developing a mental health problem or in a mental health crisis may improve access to services, social support, and mental health outcomes. This is the first study to evaluate the effectiveness of culturally adapted Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) Training for China. Methods: A two-arm wait-list pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) was conducted in 3 settings in Shanghai (health services, workplaces and community settings). Intervention settings were paired according to type and one of each pair was randomly allocated to the intervention (MHFA Training for China) or the wait-list control group, with a 1:1 allocation. Participants were invited by the trial coordinators in each setting. They were asked to complete questionnaires at baseline (T1) and 1 month (T2) and 7 months after training (T3). Control group participants were asked to complete questionnaires at corresponding times. The primary outcome was participant intended actions (recommended or not recommended) towards a person experiencing a mental health problem or in a mental health crisis. Secondary outcomes included recognition of depression in a vignette; beliefs about the helpfulness of health professionals and interventions; helping actions; confidence in providing mental health first aid; and stigmatising attitudes. Findings: Between April and May 2024, 6 clusters were recruited and randomised, with 3 in each of the intervention and control arms. Following exclusion of participants who did not provide data, 146 participants were included at baseline: 67 in the intervention group and 79 in the control group. For the primary outcome (recommended actions subscale), the intervention group showed a significantly larger improvement than the control group at T2 (8.19 [95% CI 4.05-12.34]; p < 0.001) and T3 (3.08 [95% CI -1.02 to 7.18]; p = 0.034). Differences in changes in non-recommended actions were non-significant. At T2, significant differences favouring the intervention group were observed in confidence to provide support, perceiving the person as dangerous or unpredictable and in recognition of depression in a vignette. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes at T3. Interpretation: Delivering culturally adapted MHFA Training for China more widely could improve support for people experiencing mental health problems in the community. Funding: This trial was supported the National Health and Medical Research Council under a Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases grant (GNT1142395).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.