Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080394›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Negative-Pressure Pulmonary Edema: A Perioperative Emergency.

Nissar Shaikh, Bakri Alali, Umm E Amara, Umm E Nashrah, Firdous Ummunnisa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nissar ShaikhSurgical Intensive Care, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Bakri AlaliSurgical Intensive Care, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Umm E AmaraCritical Care, Deccan College of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, IND.
Umm E NashrahCritical Care, Deccan College of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, IND.
Firdous UmmunnisaSurgical Intensive Care, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative-pressure pulmonary edema (NPPE) is a potentially fatal perioperative condition that requires increased awareness. This narrative review highlights the underrecognized aspects of the condition and analyzes the risk factors, diagnosis, management, and prevention of NPPE in the current literature. NPPE most frequently develops in the post-extubation period. It is a non-cardiogenic and non-fluid-overload pulmonary edema that occurs due to the generation of high negative pressure against a closed glottis, hence also termed obstructive pulmonary edema. NPPE is potentially lethal and requires intensive care therapy. Risk factors for developing NPPE include young age, male sex, and upper airway surgery or obstruction. Clinical manifestations include pink frothy sputum and respiratory distress. Chest X-ray and ultrasound reveal diffuse infiltrates and increased B-lines, respectively. NPPE should be differentiated from cardiogenic pulmonary edema, tension pneumothorax, aspiration pneumonia, and fluid overload by history and monitoring. Milder cases of NPPE improve with oxygen therapy and the use of non-invasive ventilation to maintain airway patency. Severe NPPE cases require intubation and invasive ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure. β-agonist therapy may help by accelerating alveolar fluid clearance. Severe cases of NPPE with persistent hypoxia may require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Preventive measures include suctioning of endotracheal secretions before extubation, limiting the number of laryngoscopy attempts, considering deep or awake extubation, and the use of lidocaine.

Indexed as

diureticsglottisinvasive ventilationlaryngospasmnegative-pressure pulmonary edemanoninvasive ventilationpeepupper airwayβ-agonist

Identifiers

PMID41080394
PMCPMC12508604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.