ReviewCureus2025
The Placebo Effect in Medicine and Clinical Practice: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric migraine: Neurodevelopmental mechanisms, clinical phenotypes, and modern therapeutics.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026Review
- Medicinal Mushrooms and Their Bioactive Compounds: From Traditional Use to Therapeutic Potential.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The "Are You OK?" Paradox: A Scoping Review of Nocebo and Negative Suggestion in Healthcare Communication.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Article
- Placebo Effects in Modern Medicine: Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, Limitations, and Future Directions.Cureus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Placebo effects are complex psychobiological phenomena driven by patients' expectations, conditioning, and contextual cues. In clinical practice, placebo effects are mediated by endogenous opioid, dopaminergic, and cholecystokinin (CCK) pathways and are accompanied by characteristic alterations in brain connectivity. Functional imaging and neurochemical investigations converge to demonstrate that these are genuine neurophysiological phenomena rather than mere responses. These effects are documented across pharmacologic, surgical, and physiotherapy and rehabilitation settings, including sham pills, surgery, and acupuncture. However, attributing observed improvements solely to placebo is challenging, as they may reflect natural history, regression to the mean, concomitant care, or active effects from control conditions. This narrative review highlights the measurable influence and clinical relevance of placebo effects across interventions. Research should continue to clarify their mechanisms and triggers to strengthen causal inference in randomized trials and guide their ethical use in practice. Accordingly, within an evidence-based and ethically sound framework, clinicians may purposefully leverage placebo-enhancing mechanisms to improve therapeutic outcomes, particularly in conditions where contextual and psychosocial factors strongly influence recovery. In practice, this entails transparent, constructive expectation-setting, minimization of nocebo cues, and, in selected contexts, the ethical use of open-label placebos alongside active treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.