ArticleCureus2025
Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Pelvi-Acetabular Fractures in Patients Admitted to a Tertiary Care Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Pelvi-acetabular fractures can have a profound impact on patient well-being and functional outcomes. Understanding patient-reported outcomes is crucial for assessing the long-term effects of treatment and improving clinical practices. The present study aimed to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in individuals treated for pelvi-acetabular fractures. Methods This study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital and included patients treated for pelvi-acetabular fractures. Data were collected from patients with a minimum follow-up of six months. Both generic PROMs (Short Form-36 (SF-36), Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), Oxford Hip Score, and Majeed Pelvic Outcome Score) and functional outcome measures (Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Parker Palmer Mobility Score) were recorded. Radiological assessment was performed using Matta grading. Agreement between the SF-36 and HHS was also evaluated. Results The mean SF-36 physical functioning component score was 92.28. The SMFA showed a mean score of 7.94. HHS results were good in 53.2% of cases and excellent in 38.3% of cases. Overall, the findings revealed favorable outcomes in terms of general health and functional status after treatment. There was significant agreement between the generic PROM (SF-36) and the disease-specific functional outcome measure (HHS), suggesting overall improvement in health and patient satisfaction. Conclusion These findings underscore the importance of comprehensively assessing patient-reported outcomes to capture the full impact of healthcare interventions. The insights from this study may help guide treatment decisions and improve patient satisfaction, particularly in regions with a high incidence of pelvi-acetabular fractures. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is warranted to refine treatment strategies and enhance the quality of care for individuals with pelvi-acetabular injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.