Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080346›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures: A Clinical Evaluation Study and Computed Tomography Scan Analysis of Screw Tracts.

Nidhil Noushad, Hariprasad Seenappa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Percutaneous Stabilization of the Thoracolumbar Spine: Indications, Limitations and Cohort Analysis].Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nidhil NoushadOrthopaedics, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, Kolar, IND.
Hariprasad SeenappaOrthopaedics, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, Kolar, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective Thoracolumbar spine fractures represent significant traumatic injuries with substantial morbidity potential, necessitating surgical interventions that balance stability with minimal tissue disruption. Conventional open approaches, while providing excellent visualization, are associated with considerable muscle damage, blood loss, and prolonged recovery periods. Minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (MIPPSF) has emerged as a promising alternative that theoretically reduces surgical trauma while maintaining effective stabilization. This prospective interventional study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes of MIPPSF among patients with thoracolumbar spine fractures and analyze screw tract placement accuracy using computed tomography scanning in carefully selected patients without neurological deficits. Methodology This prospective interventional study was conducted from May 2023 to October 2024 at R.L. Jalappa Hospital and Research Centre, Tamaka, India. Thirty patients presenting with thoracolumbar spine fractures requiring dorsal instrumentation were enrolled. Inclusion criteria encompassed patients >18 years with thoracic or lumbar spine fractures secondary to trauma, spinal neoplasia, or degenerative disorders without neurological deficits. Exclusion criteria comprised retropulsion segments occupying >50% of the spinal canal, previous spine surgery at the same level, significant posttraumatic segmental kyphosis ≥10°, and fracture dislocations. Functional outcomes were systematically assessed using validated instruments: Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Straight Leg Raise Test (SLRT), Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MODI), Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI), and Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ). Assessments were performed preoperatively and at postoperative intervals of one, three, and six months. Radiological evaluation included postoperative CT scan analysis to identify screw tracts and potential pedicle breaches. Results Anatomical distribution revealed predominance at the L1-L2 intervertebral region (n= 18, 60.0%). All functional parameters demonstrated statistically significant improvement across successive timepoints (p<0.001). VAS pain scores decreased progressively from baseline (mean=7.83, SD=0.69) to six months postoperatively (mean=1.77, SD=0.43), representing a 77.4% reduction. SLRT improved from baseline (mean=49.67°, SD=8.08) to six months (mean=75.67°, SD=7.73), indicating 52.3% functional enhancement. MODI scores demonstrated a substantial reduction from baseline (mean=75.47, SD=7.06) to six months (mean=5.60, SD=1.99), reflecting a 92.6% decrease in disability. COMI scores improved from baseline (mean=6.35, SD=1.17) to six months (mean=1.98, SD=0.75), showing 68.8% improvement. RMQ scores decreased from baseline (mean=20.20, SD=1.95) to six months (mean=3.53, SD=1.71), representing an 82.5% reduction. Radiological assessment revealed exceptional accuracy, with only one patient (3.3%) exhibiting lateral pedicle breach, resulting in a 96.7% accuracy rate. Conclusion MIPPSF demonstrates excellent clinical and radiological outcomes in carefully selected patients with thoracolumbar fractures. Progressive functional improvement across all parameters, coupled with high screw placement accuracy, supports MIPPSF as an effective therapeutic option, achieving significant pain reduction and functional recovery while maintaining technical precision.

Indexed as

computed tomographyfunctional outcomesminimally invasive surgerypedicle screwspercutaneous fixationspine fracturesthoracolumbar spine

Identifiers

PMID41080346
PMCPMC12515020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.