ArticleCureus2025
Interpalpebral Fitting Philosophy: A Rarely Used Approach to Keratoconus Management With Corneal Rigid Gas-Permeable (RGP) Contact Lenses.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This unique case report demonstrates an unusual approach to managing keratoconus: the interpalpebral fitting philosophy. This technique is rarely used in contact lens practice. In contrast, the lid-attachment fitting philosophy is more commonly utilized. The interpalpebral fitting is a challenging task concerning lens centration and stability. This report underscores the potential efficacy of the interpalpebral fitting approach in keratoconus patients with specific characteristics, such as large palpebral apertures. A 25-year-old man presented to our center for an eye examination, complaining of blurred vision. Upon examination, both eyes showed signs of keratoconus. The visual acuity without glasses was 20/400 for the right eye and 20/200 for the left eye. Visual acuity with the best correction was as follows: right eye 20/80 with -6.00/-2.50 x 45 and left eye 20/60 with -3.00/-4.00 x 145. Examinations revealed that the patient was suitable for contact lens wear, with no contraindications identified. Corneal rigid gas-permeable contact lenses with an 8.70 mm diameter were fitted according to the interpalpebral fitting strategy. The patient reported good adaptation to the lenses, with acceptable initial comfort. The fitting was excellent, resulting in a marked improvement in visual acuity, achieving 20/20 in each eye. The key takeaway from this study is that the interpalpebral fitting method is a viable option for managing keratoconus in patients with large palpebral apertures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.