Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080323›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

STONE Score as a Triage Tool to Guide Computed Tomography of the Kidneys, Ureters, and Bladder (CT-KUB) Requests in Suspected Renal Colic: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Omar Nasr Hassouba, Abdulaziz Alsamani Abdullah Omar, Manahil Awan, Shahzad Ahmad, Mawada Taha, Sharmila Venkatachalapathi, Mohamed K Abouelsadat, Albina Mercy, Abdelrahman Sahnon Abaker Sahnon, Usama Shafique and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Omar Nasr HassoubaEmergency, Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, GBR.
Abdulaziz Alsamani Abdullah OmarGeneral Surgery, Prince Othman Digna Teaching Hospital, Port Sudan, SDN.
Manahil AwanExecutive and Special Ward, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Shahzad AhmadSurgery, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Mawada TahaGeneral Surgery, The National Ribat University, Khartoum, SDN.
Sharmila VenkatachalapathiInternal Medicine, Periyar Government Hospital, Mayiladuthurai, IND.
Mohamed K AbouelsadatVascular Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London, GBR.
Albina MercyInternal Medicine, Davao Medical School Foundation, Inc., Davao, PHL.
Abdelrahman Sahnon Abaker SahnonGeneral Practice, Medical Council of Ireland, Dublin, IRL.
Usama ShafiqueGeneral Surgery, Azra Naheed Medical College, Lahore, PAK.
Dodi I HermanEmergency, Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Urolithiasis is a frequent cause of emergency department (ED) visits, with computed tomography (CT) being the gold standard for diagnosis. Excessive imaging increases radiation exposure and healthcare costs. The STONE score is a validated clinical prediction tool, designed to estimate the probability of ureteric stones and reduce unnecessary imaging. Objective The main objective of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the STONE score in patients presenting with flank pain. Methodology This is a cross-sectional retrospective review conducted at the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust (SATH), Shrewsbury, England, over a four-month period from April 1, 2023, to July 31, 2023. This quality improvement initiative reviewed 81 eligible ED patients who underwent computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder (CT-KUB) for suspected ureteric stones. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were collected. STONE scores were calculated for all patients. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results The mean age was 38.5 ± 16.1 years; 35 (43.2%) were male. Ureteric stones were confirmed in 15/19 (78.9%) high-risk, 9/45 (20%) moderate-risk, and 0/17 (0%) low-risk patients. The STONE score yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.879, with a sensitivity of 91.7% and a specificity of 66.7%. Alternative diagnoses included gallbladder stones, appendicitis, cystitis, diverticulitis, hydronephrosis, renal angiomyolipoma, polycystic kidney disease (PCKD), pyelonephritis, and small bowel obstruction (SBO). Conclusion The STONE score demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy, particularly in high-risk patients, and may help reduce unnecessary CT imaging and radiation exposure in the ED.

Indexed as

ct-kubdiagnostic accuracyemergency medicinerenal colicstone scoreureteric stone

Identifiers

PMID41080323
PMCPMC12515072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.