ReviewCureus2025
The Role of 3D Printing in Pediatric Surgical Care: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
3D printing is rapidly expanding in surgery, with particular promise in pediatric surgery because of its ability to create customized objects tailored to individual needs. This study provides a comprehensive review of the literature on the main applications of 3D printing across pediatric surgical subspecialties. The review was conducted using the PubMed database. The search identified 207 articles, of which 96 were included after applying exclusion criteria. The most represented fields were orthopedics (n = 31) and head and neck surgery (n = 26). Reported applications of 3D printing included direct clinical use (n = 41), educational purposes (n = 28), surgical planning (n = 24), and assessment of model accuracy (n = 3). The key advantages of 3D printing include the production of anatomical models, both normal and pathological, for simulation, student education, surgical planning, and improved communication with families. Limitations include concerns about the realism of the models, cost, and difficulty in demonstrating clear clinical benefits. Comparative studies will be needed to objectively establish the value of 3D printing in pediatric surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.