Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080312›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

The Role of 3D Printing in Pediatric Surgical Care: A Narrative Review.

Jeremie Nallet, Olivier Hild, Yann Chaussy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeremie NalletOrthopedic Surgery, Universite Besançon, Besançon, FRA.
Olivier HildPediatric Surgery, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, FRA.
Yann ChaussyPediatric Surgery, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, FRA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D printing is rapidly expanding in surgery, with particular promise in pediatric surgery because of its ability to create customized objects tailored to individual needs. This study provides a comprehensive review of the literature on the main applications of 3D printing across pediatric surgical subspecialties. The review was conducted using the PubMed database. The search identified 207 articles, of which 96 were included after applying exclusion criteria. The most represented fields were orthopedics (n = 31) and head and neck surgery (n = 26). Reported applications of 3D printing included direct clinical use (n = 41), educational purposes (n = 28), surgical planning (n = 24), and assessment of model accuracy (n = 3). The key advantages of 3D printing include the production of anatomical models, both normal and pathological, for simulation, student education, surgical planning, and improved communication with families. Limitations include concerns about the realism of the models, cost, and difficulty in demonstrating clear clinical benefits. Comparative studies will be needed to objectively establish the value of 3D printing in pediatric surgery.

Indexed as

3d printingpediatric surgerypreoperative planningsimulation in healthcaresystematic review (syst. rev.)

Identifiers

PMID41080312
PMCPMC12509778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.