ArticleCureus2025
Small Bowel Perforation Caused by Uterine Iatrogenic Perforation Secondary to Endometrial Curettage: A Report of a Rare Case.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Delayed Ileal Perforation With Psoas Abscess and Fistulization Into the Inferior Vena Cava Post-Dilation and Curettage-A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This report describes a rare case of small bowel perforation associated with iatrogenic uterine perforation during endometrial curettage, which was successfully treated despite delayed diagnosis. A 62-year-old patient, in septic condition and exhibiting symptoms of acute abdomen, was admitted to our hospital five days after undergoing diagnostic endometrial curettage due to postmenopausal metrorrhagia. Inflammatory markers were elevated. An emergency computed tomography (CT) scan revealed the presence of pneumoperitoneum and multiple fluid collections with air-fluid levels throughout the peritoneal cavity. Emergency laparotomy was performed, with severe fecal peritonitis secondary to small bowel perforation being observed. No primary uterine perforation site was confirmed intra-operatively, although histological examination of the endometrial curettage material confirmed the presence of smooth muscle tissue and debris of intestinal epithelium. Salvage surgery for neglected peritonitis was carried out, including enterectomy that involved the perforation site and creation of two ileostomies (end ileostomy and mucus fistula). The patient's worsening condition prompted admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), where she remained for 22 days and was subsequently transferred to the surgical ward, where she remained for another 15 days. She was discharged from the ward in good condition with instructions for follow-up assessment and scheduling of bowel restoration surgery. Based on the description of this rare case, the diagnostic approach and therapeutic options for this rare complication are discussed. Special emphasis is placed on the benefits of early diagnosis, which significantly contributes to ensuring the best prognostic outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.