Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080287›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Effect of the Spencer Technique on Glenohumeral Joint Range of Motion: A Comparative Analysis of Athletes Versus Non-athletes.

Daniel P Oar, Alexandria Zarilla, Dante DiSilvestro, Zachary J Buchman, Alex Abouafech, David Boesler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel P OarSchool of Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Alexandria ZarillaSchool of Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Dante DiSilvestroSchool of Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Zachary J BuchmanSchool of Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Alex AbouafechSchool of Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
David BoeslerOsteopathic Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Spencer technique of the shoulder is an osteopathic manipulative technique used to treat somatic dysfunction and improve glenohumeral range of motion. Current literature aims to examine the efficacy of the Spencer technique of the shoulder, but falls short in investigating the technique's usefulness in patient populations with varying levels of physical activity and joint usage. This study examines the Spencer technique's impact on the shoulder range of motion in recreational pickleball players compared to non-pickleball players.

objectiveThe goal of this study was to compare the effects of the Spencer technique on the shoulder in recreational pickleball players versus non-pickleball players.

methodsFifty-four participants were recruited and divided into four groups: pickleball players with Spencer treatment (n=12), pickleball players with no Spencer treatment (n=12), non-pickleball players with Spencer treatment (n=15), and non-pickleball players with no Spencer treatment (n=15). The Spencer treatment groups were treated twice per week for two weeks, and the pickleball playing groups participated in recreational pickleball sessions twice per week for two weeks. Measurements of shoulder range of motion in flexion, extension, internal rotation, external rotation, abduction, and adduction were taken at study onset and two weeks later upon study completion. The average change in range of motion from baseline for all four groups was determined, and two-factor analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with post-hoc two-sample, two-tailed t-tests were used to investigate individual and combined effects as well as differences amongst the groups in each plane of motion.

resultsOf the initial 54 participants enrolled in the study, 53 successfully completed all study requirements and were included in the data analysis. Statistically significant differences were found amongst the four different groups in terms of average change in degrees of shoulder flexion, extension, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation over the two-week course of the study. This difference was seen when comparing the pickleball and Spencer treatment group, which experienced greater change, to the other groups in flexion, extension, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation. No significant differences were observed amongst the four groups for shoulder adduction.

conclusionThis study found that Spencer treatment paired with pickleball playing produced a statistically significant greater change in range of motion from baseline for shoulder flexion, extension, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation compared to the other groups. No significant differences in shoulder adduction were found amongst the four groups. These findings highlight the benefit of combining Spencer treatment with recreational exercise in improving shoulder range of motion. With a more complete understanding of how Spencer treatment affects patients with varying exercise habits, osteopathic clinicians will be better positioned to deliver more personalized care and ensure optimal clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

athletic performanceglenohumeral jointomt in sportorthopedic sports medicineosteopathic manipulative medicineosteopathic manipulative treatment (omt)spencer technique

Identifiers

PMID41080287
PMCPMC12507718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.