ArticleCureus2025
From Rights to Risks: Mental Health Implications for Pregnant Patients Following the Reversal of Roe v. Wade.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The overturn of Roe v. Wade threatened reproductive rights, leading to bans, delayed access to care, and potentially increased psychological stress surrounding abortion care. We aim to assess the incidence and prevalence of acute stress episodes (ASE) and depressive episode diagnoses in patients after a non-spontaneous abortion. Methods We used a medical record database, TriNetX (TriNetX, LLC, Cambridge, MA), to assess the incidence and prevalence of depressive episodes (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification {ICD-10-CM}=F32) and acute stress episodes (ICD-10-CM=F43.0, F43.9, and F43.11) in patients who received non-spontaneous abortions across 66 US healthcare organizations. We used relative risk with 95% confidence intervals to compare outcomes across three periods: pre-COVID (July 2017-2019), COVID (July 2020-2022), and post-Roe v. Wade (pRvW, July 2022-2024). Chi-squared (χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.