Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080261›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Excess Cost of Telehealth Use in Radiation Oncology: A Medicare-Based Cohort Study.

Kishan M Patel, Tarita Thomas, Dwight E Heron, Aaron Bush, Constantine A Mantz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kishan M PatelRadiation Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
Tarita ThomasRadiation Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
Dwight E HeronRadiation Oncology, Bon Secours Mercy Health System, Youngstown, USA.
Aaron BushRadiation Oncology, Costal Edge Radiation Oncology, Port Saint Lucie, USA.
Constantine A MantzRadiation Oncology, GenesisCare US, Fort Meyers, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic necessitated rapid adaptations in healthcare delivery to ensure continuity of care while minimizing patient exposure to the virus. Telehealth emerged as a critical tool, supported by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) emergency waivers, which expanded telehealth services to include radiation treatment management. While telehealth has improved accessibility and convenience, its impact on clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization in oncology remains unclear. This study examines telehealth utilization during external beam radiation therapy episodes among Medicare beneficiaries, focusing on its association with emergency department (ED) visits, inpatient stays (IS), and related costs.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed Medicare beneficiaries who received external beam radiation therapy in outpatient hospital-based settings between 2020 and 2022. Radiation therapy episodes were constructed using the Medicare Standard Analytic Files (SAF) and included all treatment-related services provided over 90 days. Telehealth utilization was identified using Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes, while ED visits and IS were determined from outpatient and inpatient claims. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the association between telehealth use and healthcare utilization, adjusting for demographic and clinical risk factors. Costs were calculated based on Medicare payments and adjusted for inflation to account for changes in purchasing power over time.

resultsA total of 369,570 radiation therapy episodes were analyzed. Telehealth utilization declined from 9.6% in 2020 to 5.5% in 2022 but remained consistent within episodes where it was used. Patients utilizing telehealth had higher rates of ED visits (38.2% vs 30.2%) and IS (29.9% vs 21.6%) compared to those without telehealth. Multivariate analysis confirmed telehealth as a significant predictor of ED visits (p < 0.001, OR 1.057) and IS (p < 0.001, OR 1.080). Excess events attributed to telehealth use were estimated at 500 ED visits and 541 IS, with associated costs of $16.3 million during the study period.

conclusionTelehealth has become an essential component of cancer care, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telehealth use during radiation therapy episodes was associated with increased healthcare utilization and costs, highlighting the need for optimized telehealth delivery models. Proactive care coordination and symptom management strategies may mitigate these risks. Further research is needed to explore the long-term impact of telehealth on patient outcomes and to refine its role in oncology care.

Indexed as

excess costhospitalizationsinpatient staysmedicare codingpatient carerisk mitigationtelehealth

Identifiers

PMID41080261
PMCPMC12513327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.