ReviewCureus2025
Role of Artificial Intelligence in Reducing Error Rates in Radiology: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review examines how artificial intelligence (AI) can help reduce errors in radiology, an area where accuracy is critical to patient care. Radiology inherently involves complex image interpretation, and even minor mistakes can lead to delayed or wrong diagnoses, as well as inappropriate treatment. With advancements in AI, particularly in machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and natural language processing (NLP), there is growing interest in how these technologies can support radiologists and improve clinical outcomes. This review analyzed 12 studies that applied AI at various stages of the radiology workflow: before, during, and after image acquisition. AI has been used to assist in selecting appropriate imaging protocols, improving patient positioning, reducing motion artifacts, identifying abnormalities in scans, and supporting the generation of radiology reports. Across these applications, AI consistently demonstrated improvements in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, while significantly reducing reported error rates. In several cases, AI tools successfully flagged overlooked findings, acting as a safety net in high-pressure clinical environments. Despite these promising results, challenges remain. Issues such as algorithmic bias, limited data quality, and the need for robust clinical validation still require attention. Nonetheless, the evidence suggests that AI can serve as a valuable adjunct, enhancing diagnostic precision and supporting radiologists in delivering safer, more effective care. Overall, this review highlights the growing practical impact of AI in radiology and provides insights into how these technologies are already reshaping the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.