ArticleChonnam medical journal2025
Comparison of Apixaban with Warfarin for the Prevention of Subclinical Cerebral Infarction after Direct Current Cardioversion in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
Article in Chonnam medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subclinical cerebral infarction might be developed even adequate oral anticoagulation after direct current cardioversion (DCCV) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Although apixaban is preferred to prevent thromboembolism and minimize bleeding risk in patients with AF, clinical outcomes after DCCV have not been known well. This study aimed to compare the occurrence of subclinical infarction between apixaban and warfarin in patients with AF after DCCV. A total of 60 patients diagnosed with non-valvular AF were randomized to receive either Apixaban or warfarin. At least 3-week anticoagulation was warranted before DCCV. Brain magnetic resonance image (MRI) was checked 3 days later after DCCV. All of the patients were followed upto 1-month. The primary end-point was the occurrence of subclinical infarction, while secondary end-point included death, stroke, and hospitalization due to heart failure. Safety end-point focused on major bleeding. Micro-embolic infarction causing subclinical infarction were not observed in the warfarin group, while 1 patient (4.3%) in the apixaban group, without statistical difference. Stroke and hospitalization were not developed at both groups. Brain MRI revealed micro-bleeding in 1 patient (4.3%) in the apixaban group, while there was no major or micro-bleeding in the warfarin group. The incidence of micro-embolic events causing subclinical infarction following DCCV was comparable between apixaban and warfarin. Clinical outcomes after DCCV were comparable between the 2 groups. These findings suggest that both apixban and warfarin exhibit similar safety and efficacy profiles during DCCV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.