ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2025
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of a primary brain tumor diagnosis on caregivers: Insights from the patients' perspective.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Individuals with glioma endorse high fear of cancer recurrence or progression (FCR), yet existing interventional studies for FCR exclude glioma patients. Components of existing FCR interventions are not entirely translatable to those with glioma as they were designed for non-central nervous system (non-CNS) cancer populations with less risk for recurrence, minimal-to-no neurologic sequelae, and different sources of worry. Methods: A two-stage Phase I ORBIT Model process was employed: Phase Ia included consultation with international FCR experts and two advisory boards toward the development of an intervention targeting FCR in neuro-oncology. Recommendations resulted in a 6-module mindfulness-based cognitive-existential intervention: Results: Phase Ia results supported an individual- or dyadic-level intervention with an emphasis on the inclusion of caregivers, a focus on individuals affected by malignant gliomas, and strategies to address glioma-specific FCR hypervigilance symptoms. Our phase Ib trial demonstrated adequate rates of enrollment, measure completion, retention, and satisfaction; however, screening rates (successful screening of those interested) were lower among caregivers. Conclusion: Findings support continued optimization of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.