ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2025
A single-institution study of the natural history of fibroblast growth factor receptor-altered gliomas.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations are potential oncogenic drivers that occur in a subset of patients with gliomas, but the natural history of these tumors is not clearly defined. An understanding of outcomes of FGFR-driven glioma has implications for targeted drug development for FGFR inhibitors, which are approved for other cancers. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with gliomas who harbored FGFR alterations, including fusions, single nucleotide variant (SNV), and copy number variant (CNV) alterations seen at Massachusetts General Hospital between 2003 and 2023. The electronic medical record was searched to identify additional molecular data, treatment, and MRI scans. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess progression-free and overall survival (OS). Results: Thirty-one patients with glioblastoma (GBM), diffuse astrocytoma, and glioneuronal tumors with FGFR alterations were identified: 17 with FGFR fusions, 10 with SNV, and 4 with CNV. FGFR3-TACC3 was the most common fusion in patients with GBM or diffuse astrocytoma. Median OS in patients with GBM was 2.75 years, despite 55% of tumors having an unmethylated MGMT promoter. There were no clearly co-occurring mutations with an FGFR alteration. Of 7 patients who underwent subsequent surgery, 6 lost the original FGFR alteration. No patient received an FGFR inhibitor. Conclusions: While FGFR alterations are rare in glioma, patients with FGFR-altered GBM may have prolonged survival, which has implications for clinical trial design. We found loss of FGFR alteration at the time of subsequent surgery, raising concern for the therapeutic potential of FGFR-targeting agents in recurrent gliomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.