ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2025
End-of-life care in patients with glioblastoma after early advance care planning.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We aimed to evaluate the preferred and received end-of-life (EoL) care in glioblastoma patients who participated in a local nurse-led advance care planning (ACP) program, as well as the perceived quality of care. Methods: Twelve proxies of patients with glioblastoma who participated in an ACP program completed a study-specific questionnaire after the patient deceased, comprising the following topics: organization of EoL care, patient's preferences and wishes, received care during the last 3 months, and proxies' experiences with EoL care. The outcomes were compared with those from a historical cohort of Dutch patients with glioblastoma ( Results: Nine out of 12 patients lived at home 3 months before death and most (8/12) died at home. In 11/12 cases, the general practitioner was responsible for EoL care in the last week before death. Proxies indicated that most patients rated their quality of received EoL care as very good to excellent in the last 3 months and last week before death (67% and 75%, respectively), that 8/12 patients died with dignity and that all proxies were involved as much as they wanted in decision-making. One-third of the patients in the ACP cohort were relocated at least once in the last 3 months versus 48% of the patients in the historical cohort. Conclusions: Despite the limited number of participants, this study suggests that a nurse-led ACP program has a positive impact on several aspects of EoL care for patients with glioblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.