ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2025
Animal models for understanding the mechanisms of malnutrition: a literature review.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nutrient Deprivation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Human Microbiota-Associated Pig Models for Translational Microbiome Research: A Scoping Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malnutrition, encompassing undernutrition, micronutrient deficiencies, and overnutrition, remain a pervasive global health challenge. This underprivileged condition contributes significantly to worldwide morbidity and mortality and causes profound impairments in growth, development, immune function, and metabolic health. Understanding the underlying biological mechanisms is critical, and animal models are indispensable tools for dissecting these complex pathways and for evaluating potential nutritional interventions under controlled conditions that are infeasible in humans. This literature review comprehensively examines rodent models and explores other diverse animal models used to investigate malnutrition, ranging from invertebrates (e.g., Drosophila) and fish (zebrafish) to mammals (piglets and non-human primates). We highlight how each model has yielded mechanistic insights into malnutrition-induced pathophysiology, i.e., from altered metabolic signaling to immune dysfunction and critically evaluate their strengths and limitations in replicating the multifactorial nature of human malnutrition. Key considerations include the extent to which each model mimics human nutritional deficits or excesses, appropriate developmental stages, species-specific metabolic differences, and the influence of comorbid factors such as infection or gut microbiome alterations. We emphasize translational relevance by identifying where animal-derived findings align with clinical observations and where they diverge, underscoring the challenges in extrapolating preclinical results to human disease. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive resource to guide researchers in selecting appropriate animal models and interpreting their findings, with the ultimate goal of enhancing the translation of preclinical insights into improved strategies to address malnutrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.