ArticleFood chemistry: X2025
A novel MOF-on-MOF composite versus its MOF shell: a comparative sorbent study for dispersive micro-solid phase extraction of pesticides in food samples.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- MOF-on-MOF heterostructured composites for food safety analysis: construction strategies, sensing applications and sample pretreatment.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Rapid and Green Extraction of Food Contaminants: Integrating Advanced Porous Materials and Miniaturized Functional Platforms for Chromatographic and Mass Spectrometric Analysis.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Engineering a visible-light-driven heterostructure: synergistic catalysis of bimetallic MIL-88B(Fe/Co)@TiOScientific reports · 2026Article
- Synthesis of a Chlorella/ZnO/ZnFeFood chemistry: X · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pervasive application of organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs) in agriculture underscores the critical need for sensitive and reliable analytical techniques to safeguard food safety. Addressing this challenge, this work presents a rigorous comparative evaluation of two engineered sorbents for dispersive micro-solid phase extraction (D-μ-SPE) prior to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS): Bimetallic Fe/Co-MIL-88A and a novel Bimetallic Fe/Co-MIL-88A-on-MIL-88B composite. While both sorbents demonstrated high and statistically comparable extraction efficiencies, the composite was selected for its exceptional reusability and sustained performance over five consecutive cycles. Leveraging a design of experiments (DoE) approach, key extraction parameters were optimized for both sorbents, achieving remarkable sensitivity and precision. The method demonstrates an impressive linear dynamic range (LDR) of 0.07-900 ng mL
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.