Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080111›Full record

ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2025

MR Lymphangiography in Pediatrics: Indications, Technique, Findings, and Management.

Sheena Pimpalwar, Tarique Hussain, Surendranath R Veeram Reddy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sheena PimpalwarSection of Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Children's Medical Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Tarique HussainDepartment of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Surendranath R Veeram ReddyDepartment of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past two decades, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become the mainstay for lymphatic imaging in pediatric patients suffering from lymphatic disorders caused by congenital or acquired causes. Pediatric patients, especially those born with complex congenital heart disease, status post single ventricle palliation increasingly constitute the largest group of patients presenting with lymphatic dysfunction. Heavily T2-weighted and 3D-balanced steady-state free precession are complementary MRI sequences used for noninvasive assessment of the central lymphatic anatomy as well as distribution of lymphatic fluid in body cavities, lymphatic cysts, and lymphatic malformations. These sequences are, however, limited in their ability to visualize smaller lymphatics, to differentiate lymphatics from other fluid-filled structures, or to provide sequential flow information. This limitation is overcome by administering a gadolinium-based contrast agent into a lymph node, lymphatic vessel, or interstitial tissue with simultaneous image acquisition, a technique called dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography. This imaging is invasive but critical for evaluating lymphatic flow and identifying potential targets for lymphatic intervention. Medical therapy, along with traditional transcatheter or surgical approaches to address the underlying cause of the lymphatic disorder, remains the first-line approach, while lymphatic interventions are reserved for patients who have failed these therapies.

Indexed as

chylothoraxchylous ascitesdynamic contrast-enhanced MR lymphangiographyinterventional radiologyplastic bronchitisprotein-losing enteropathy

Identifiers

PMID41080111
PMCPMC12513754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.