Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080110›Full record

ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2025

Pediatric Renovascular Hypertension: Diagnosis and Management.

Kishore Minhas, Anne Marie Cahill, Premal A Patel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kishore MinhasInterventional Radiology, Radiology Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, Great Ormond Street, London, United Kingdom.
Anne Marie CahillInterventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Premal A PatelInterventional Radiology, Radiology Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, Great Ormond Street, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3504-5092

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric renovascular hypertension (RVH) is a significant cause of secondary hypertension in children, often resulting from renal artery stenosis (RAS) due to nonatherosclerotic etiologies such as fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD), mid aortic syndrome (MAS), and syndromic conditions like neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1). Early diagnosis is critical to prevent long-term complications, including renal dysfunction and cardiovascular disease. Diagnostic evaluation begins with ultrasound, which, despite its limitations, remains the first-line modality. Advanced imaging techniques such as CT angiography (CTA), MR angiography (MRA), and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) provide detailed vascular assessment, with DSA considered the gold standard. Adjunctive tools like intravascular pressure measurements, intravascular imaging, and renal vein renin sampling supplement DSA. Management should have multidisciplinary consensus and is tailored to the individual patient. Pharmacological therapy is seldom sufficient and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is effective in many cases. Stent placement and surgical interventions are reserved for refractory or complex cases. Chemical ablation in select cases and emerging therapies such as renal denervation offer additional options. This review outlines the current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to pediatric RVH, emphasizing the importance of personalized care and the role of specialist pediatric centers, with experience in managing RVH, in optimizing outcomes.

Indexed as

fibro-muscular dysplasiamid-aortic syndromerenal artery stenosis

Identifiers

PMID41080110
PMCPMC12513751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.